Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work
Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work
Blog Article
“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after a long way they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't suggest that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These kinds of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of past witnessed.
14. In the light from the position explained previously mentioned, it is actually concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be deemed for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the length of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
4. Record shows that the petitioner has long been booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in All those cases, it does, prima facie, build that the petitioner is susceptible to repeating the offence.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
“Making sure the accuracy of legal information is paramount,” says Barrister Ayesha Khan, a leading legal expert in Lahore. “Cross-referencing information from multiple reliable sources is essential for reliable legal research.”
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court may possibly interfere with the summary or the finding and mildew the relief to make it proper to your facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified by the decision from the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be effectively-settled that when contemplating click here the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to consider the merit of the many eligible candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to these types of qualified candidates who're found to be most meritorious among them. Because the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked with the respondent department just to increase favor towards the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part with the respondent department.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders preserving in view that among the respondents has retired from service as pointed out because of the counsel to the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may exist conflicts between the assorted lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
Please note, if you are seeking a fee exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is normally only accomplished In case the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were properly aware about the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
To invoke section 300 and 302 just because death has occurred is the greatest tragedy of all. It does the precise opposite of what a legal system is there to accomplish, i.e. protected its citizens.
13309-B of 2010 to become weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be witnessed for the time of your trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Consequently, confirmed custody from the petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any helpful purpose at this stage.”
Even though the death penalty is irreversible, life imprisonment allows for your possibility of reconsideration or commutation in the sentence in certain circumstances.